On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, I know for this bug. I studied this thread, so I have some suggestions > about that. > > People on Fedora's repository suggest than we exclude libffmpeg from mlt > package, and that someone else maybe once build mlt-ffmpeg package on > rpm-fusion repository. > This is confusing and, I think quite unnecessary. > > So I suggest than we build these packages (mlt, mlt++ and kdenlive) for > rpm-fusion repo with buildin all libs. > > What are you thinking about that?
I think that is a good idea. However, I do not always understand the Fedora project's ideas and goals. At one one point I thought they wanted kdenlive in the core repo to have a good, intermediate-level editor (for people who have not yet discovered rpm-fusion or refuse to use it), but without the legal or idealogical strings attached. If your goal is to provide packages to kdenlive users who are using Fedora, then rpm-fusion is the way to go. If the goal is to provide a politically correct solution or to advance an agenda or movement, then perhaps not. -- +-DRD-+
