On Wednesday 03 June 2009 09:06:59 Dan Dennedy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Oceanwatcher <video at datahverdag.com> wrote:
> As we discussed in the forum, and I as mentioned here previously, I do > think we need to cleanup the names of the transitions. Let's put aside > the issue with the Composite transition for the moment. I am thinking > namely about "Luma" and "Wipe." I had proposed a new one named > "Dissolve" that would become the default - basically a featureless > version of today's Luma. Then, I think Wipe should be called Slide > (please confirm). Finally, what is currently Luma would be called > Wipe. Do you agree? JB, are you ok with this? Yes, I agree that "Luma" is really not an explicit name. I am ok with the proposes name change. regards jb
