why not looking for being able to reproduce the bug in the KDE4 version? if it cant be reproduced, then bug is fixed
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:15 PM, jb <jb at kdenlive.org> wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 10:57:34 Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote: > > s?ndag 14 September 2008 skrev Jean-Michel Pour?: > > > > It seems the quality of the bug reports on > > > > http://www.kdenlive.org/mantis are > > > > below par in many cases. Would it be OK to start asking people for > > > > more > > > > information - and perhaps suggest that the bugs gets closed if people > > > > run the > > > > KDE 3 version? > > I agree that KDE3 version bugs should be marked as "won't fix", maybe with > a > small note saying that the bug is not applicable or cannot be reproduced on > the KDE4 version... also ok for me to ask more info or an update on bugs > that > lack info. > > > I wouldn't mind pruning out some obvious. Should I ask on this list, or > > directly to JB? > > to Mads: > I just changed your access rights on the Kdenlive's mantis bug tracker, so > you should be able to close bugs. > > regards > jb > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20080925/b564d6eb/attachment.html>
