On Friday 08 June 2007 1:05:39 pm jb wrote: > Probably the most visible change is in the rendering. Previously, if you > were working on a 16:9 project and rendered it as 320x200 video, black bars
Why would one choose 320x200 when it is not a 16:9 ratio? Or, is that just an example? > were added up and down so that the image was not distorted. With my recent > changes, the video is now scaled to fit the full screen, but has a display > ratio that is set so that the player should scale the image to restore it's You mean--logically, not in mlt terminology--scale/zoom to fill the target resolution and then crop the excess? > The new behaviour seems more logical to me. If I have positive feedback, I > will stop here for version 0.5 and prepare the release. Do you need a new mlt release? -- +-DRD-+
