Just about that. Yes, it "costs" 2 tracks. But on the over hand, time of
> transition is really clear this way. I don't know how it is in "pro" > softwares, but if amateur is aimed (more than in Windows MM), transition > has to be evident. > > In my experience, clips on two separate timelines end up being unmanageable due to the clips wanting to auto-stick-together and not paying attention to the other timelines; they should fill each others' gaps but often act as an independent timeline. Eventually, with large projects, everything on two+ separate timelines ends up costing more time and frustration than if it were just on one timeline, due to reshuffling/fixing the clips. But I do see the benefit of the visual overlap on two timelines. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20070405/9d0ff300/attachment.html>
