On Tuesday 19 Nov 2002 6:43 pm, Rolf Dubitzky wrote: > On Tuesday 19 November 2002 05:27 pm, Jason Wood wrote: > > If the API is reasonably stable, I'd much prefer to use xml++. > > I'm not 100% sure about that. I'll try it out as it is in the upcomming > release. If it's working for our purposes, I'd suggest to use it. I mean, > it was warking before, if they didn't break too much it'll still work. We > don't have to follow every new release, we jus grab one, put in our CVS and > use this version. It doesn't, make sense to ask people who want to try out > kdenlive to checkout/compile/install various libraries. > As soon as the API is stable, and it becomes reasonable to expect users to > install a seperate lib (or they have it by default), we can upgrade the > cutters to the lates libxml++ version. Does that make sense?
yes, it does. Cheers, Jason -- Jason Wood Homepage : www.uchian.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
