https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150875
Andre Heinecke <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Andre Heinecke <[email protected]> --- Pierre: There is a trust model in place to avoid having to sign every key to trust the owner. http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/x334.html Albert: You can see in your screenshot that you have unknown trust in the identitiy [email protected] and thats what KMail says to you (I just takes it's information from gnupg for that matter). If kevin would have sent the mail as [email protected] it would have been green. As you know that the identities [email protected] and [email protected] are the same person (keyholder) i see no reason why you should not sign this and then kmail would show it as valid/trusted again. But imagine the case that you trust my key [email protected] and then one day I decide to add [email protected] to this identity and send you a mail. You would not want to see that as a valid signature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
