https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338186
--- Comment #53 from Christian Mollekopf <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel Naziri from comment #51) > (In reply to Carsten Pfeiffer from comment #50) > > (In reply to Marcel Naziri from comment #49) > > > Anyone tested my patch for ImapInterval in kdepimlibs? > > > > Will do so tonight or tomorrow night. Completely missed that the patch is > > attached. > > I realized that with my patch flags (e.g. read/unread) changed by another > client aren't reflected in kmail when refreshing the folder. not until > mailbox content is changed (new mail arrived or something moved) the flags > are updated. > > Is this also happening with Christians patch v2? Please note that your patch is really rather a workaround that cannot be upstreamed. Thanks a lot for your analysis though as it pointed me in the right direction. What's currently missing from my patch is that we are not using the optimization that avoid downloading all messages on every sync. This is because we usually rely on a combination of message-count and uidnext to detect if new messages are available or old ones have been deleted. Whitout uidnext we could still avoid a sync if the messagecount remains the same, but then we would run into the problem that we for instance would never notice if i.e. one message has been removed and another one added (which is nasty because it's very unpredictable). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
