https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341426
--- Comment #5 from Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Laurent Montel in comment #4) > If you think that you are better send patch and co no ? I've been retired for 16 years, but before that I was personally responsible for the whole of the software development and maintenance cycle on a 17-mainframe system distributed over five sites with dual-redundant HDLC links, scores of thousands of real-time inputs, 10 programming languages, user construction of complex engineering displays, ... (I needen't go on). I don't impugn the competence of anybody in particular, but it cannot be denied that any software development system must be broken if it allows the release of fiascos like the first few versions of KDE-4, and in particular KMail-2, which destroyed e-mail collections around the world and drove many previously happy users to find other ways of managing e-mail. If anything remotely resembling such humiliations as those had happened on my watch, the consequences for all those involved - and for electricity supply in the UK - would have been dire. I don't wish to blame any one person, as I said, but some quality control is needed, together with a quality management system (see ISO-9001). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
