So any guidance from the ISC gurus on this topic? My host reservation
seems to work fine only if the correct subnet is assigned, but if a
different subnet (still part of the same shared network) is assigned
then the client gets a lease from a pool. If I lock down the upstream
router to only use the XXX.YYY.169.1 giaddr then normal DHCP clients who
need addresses from the 170 or 171 subnets get nothing.
Can I define multiple non-contiguous address pools inside the same
subnet declaration to handle both the static and dynamic clients?
I'm stumped. Thanks for any help.
-Bryan
On 5/10/2016 1:05 PM, Thomas Andersen wrote:
Not sure that you can, and I’m not sure it’s how it is intended.
But it’s a bit deeper than what i normally deal with.
Maybe one of the ISC guys can elaborate.
Br,
Thomas
On 10/05/16 20:58, "[email protected] on behalf of Bryan Perry"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
So the question becomes, how do I force it back to subnet 169 when the
DHCPDISCOVER comes in from the .170.1 relay address (which is the same
router) and the hosts entry is for subnet 169?
_______________________________________________
Kea-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
