"Chaigneau, Nicolas" writes: > But it would be even better if we had an "include" directive. I think it has > already been suggested, maybe it's time to add this.
=> we already have a lexical (*) include as an extension to JSON, e.g.: <?include "/foo/bar" ?> (PS: lexical as it is handled by flex generated code, for instance you can include unbalanced JSON parts when CPP is syntactic). Regards Francis Dupont <[email protected]> PS: this feature was added for exactly this use case. It supports recursive includes and raises a fatal error when the include stack depth is greater than 10 (i.e. when it loops). _______________________________________________ Kea-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
