> In the older dhcpd server, this is an unfortunate result of the assumption > that the DHCP is serving DHCP on the subnet it is connected to. I would > have hoped that kea would have fixed that. (Or can someone explain why it > is needed?)
=> it is a bit worse: ISC DHCP has a loose notion of servicing interfaces when Kea has a strong one. There is another difference about interfaces than the one you described: in ISC DHCP the list of interfaces to serve is in command line arguments, in Kea it is in the config file. As a result when you translate ISC DHCP configs using the tool in general you get this warning at the top of the generated kea config file: /// This configuration declares some subnets but has no interfaces-config /// Reference Kea #5256 Even it is legal to have no interfaces-config clause in Kea it won't work and without any interface in ISC DHCP config the tool can't infer the interface list... Regards Francis Dupont <[email protected]> PS: in Jeff's case it is better to select subnets using relay addresses than using the receiving interface because a priori relays serve different physical subnets so should not share the same pool. _______________________________________________ Kea-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
