"Sutherland, Rob" writes: > I have a quick question: if I have a client class named, say, "foo", how do > I define a class for everything NOT in "foo" (without negating the entire > test defined in "foo")?
=> not yet but it is in my TODO list. BTW if you have a concrete example it will help for the documentation (real world examples are always better) and to convince my colleagues there is an important item which should be do in Kea 1.4 with a good priority. Note there should be a design phase as it is not the only thing which can (should!) be improved in client classification and it is not trivial too (dependency loops must be detected). Thanks Francis Dupont <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Kea-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
