On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, at 07:11, Klaus Steden wrote: > > Correct, I am currently listing all relay IPs individually. It seems to be > the case that by using the shared-network parameter and defining my DHCP > pools within that context that I only have to include the list of relays > once, and then requests from any of these relay IPs are processed correctly > for every pool. > > But ... it's still a static list of relays that requires making updates that > we're not always informed of -- hence the desire to use range or CIDR prefix > notation -- as the only thing that is known for sure is that future relay IPs > will always be found only on specific subnets within our network.
Sounds like it might be time for an official feature request :-)
-- ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. To unsubscribe visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users. Kea-users mailing list Kea-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
