Shash,I have to agree with you, I don't like it either. There are two checkboxes I can play with. The two bits were originally "00", I have set to "11", let me play with the rest of the truth-table to see what the effects are.
Is there any way to to only show part of the email address (like everything before the @) or only show the user's name?
I really find it disorienting to not be able to see who sent a message,Are you volunteering to write that one :-) ? We do have a JavaMail service that can read incoming mail, I even know the guy who wrote that service! Kidding aside, I don't think we have enough bodies to tend to our own server (backup/archive/maintenance burden), if we can't get what we want we'll go back to the old way and take on the risk of spam.
and it seems like a big loss to me. In fact, none of those options are
viable, I would rather see us create our own list serve using keel and
host that site on our own servers rather than using what ever list serve
we are on now.
BTW, what are we using now? Is it free? Is it already running a box thatThe list is GNU Mailman 2.0.11 based (the latest stable is Mailman 2.1.3, the last 2.0 is 2.0.13)
someone is donating?
Shash
-Phil
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 00:26,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Just FYI. I got tired of all the SPAM, and changed my email address. I have changed the list options to hide the sender email address so it gets harder to harvest addresses from this list.
So, when sending mail to this list, please include your name so we know who wrote the email.
Shash
PS: If the consensus on the list is that it is better to have the originators email address exposed, so be it, I'll put it back the way it was...let me know.
http://keelframework.org/documentation Keelgroup mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com
