Sasvata (Shash) Chatterjee wrote:
Steve,
I was wondering about the feasibility of making the following change
to the Keel base Model, to allow for the ready inclusion of the Keel
Menu in all applications....
This is probably not a good idea, since the idea in Keel is to have
independent services. This is better done with sequences. Here's an
example from app-register:
<sequence id="register.prompt-registration-seq" logger="register">
<model name="nav.navigate" return="false"/>
<model name="register.headerinfo" return="false"/>
<model name="register.prompt-registration"/>
</sequence>
I have also found that when defining Commands in my Models, it is much
better to use the name of a sequence rather than a model directly. I
just go ahead and define sequences even though there might only be one
model in the sequence. It just makes mixing/matching models much easier
later.
Shash
Hmmm, Guess this means I have to learn sequences now <grin>. Will do that after I roll current iteration of product out the door.
Regards,
Steve
--
Java/J2EE Developer/Integrator
Co-Chair, Dallas/FortWorth J2EE Sig
214-724-7741
http://keelframework.org/documentation
Keelgroup mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com
