Shash: This is great - I mean the report, not what it says :-)
I've been considering an extension of the abstract Keel unit test class that is specifically for testing models - this might be a good foundation for getting model unit tests out there, as that's clearly a big gap according to the report. Mike On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:21:22 -0600 "Shash Chatterjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Over lunch I hooked up clover to Keel, it was surprisingly easy. Once I get a > chance to enter some tracker-items, I'll check the changes in to the build.xml. > There is one property in ant.properties that needs to be uncommented to enable > clover instrumentation. Then clean, assemble-deploy, tests, > clover.html/clover.pdf. In addition, you need to have clover.jar int > $ANT_HOME/lib and keel-server/lib (I'll change this to be a test-tool lib dir > under keel-build, since I'm sure other tools will need JARs only during testing). > > In any case, see attached summary PDF. Looks like we have just under 20% test > coverage :-(. For some classes, even though we don't have direct tests, they > get covered somewhat because of indirect refrences to the container and > dependencies on other services. > > Shash > > Michael Nash JGlobal Ltd Next-Generation Web Application Development and Open Source Support http://www.jglobal.com Bahamas Commerce and Trade Offshore eCommerce Hosting and Business Services http://www.bahamascommerce.com http://keelframework.org/documentation Keelgroup mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com
