Re: [Keelgroup] Utility Models?

[Doug Warren]

I agree that keel-container should just be a "container".  However, I'm not 
sure that all utilities are "applications" either.  What about utility 
"services", or "utility models"?  Is there a need to differentiate types of 
services?  What's the difference between an application and a service, and 
what is a utility?  There might be common functions, such as Sequence, that 
provide additional Keel component model options.  I understand Shash's 
reluctance to move that to an application, because it's not really an 
application anyway.  Perhaps, there's other packaging that's appropriate 
for a model framework.  It's important to keep the container minimal, so 
this discussion is approrpriate.

+1
Doug Warren
http://keelframework.org/documentation
Keelgroup mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com