TDS amount in Vodafone case estimated at close to $2 billion.  







Our Bureau 

New Delhi, Dec. 4 The Income-Tax Department estimates that tax deducted at 
source (TDS) amounting to about $ 2 billion had not been paid to the exchequer 
in the $ 11.2-billion Hutch-Essar deal.

The Bombay High Court decision to dismiss the writ petition of Vodafone 
International Holdings (VIH) has also strengthened the hands of the department 
to look at other offshore transactions/cases involving transfer of assets 
situated in India.

"The Bombay High Court move has definitely encouraged us and strengthened our 
hands in bringing to tax in India transactions involving transfer of assets 
situated here between entities located outside the country," Mr N.B. Singh, 
Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), said here today. 

Although the TDS amount involved has been pegged around $ 2 billion, official 
sources noted that the amount is subject to final computation by the 
department. Also, the notice issued does not put an exact number on the TDS 
amount that was not deducted and paid to the Government, they added. .

"We will be democratic..", Mr Singh said when asked if the tax department would 
now pursue or open up assessments on other transactions that were undertaken 
offshore with Indian assets. He declined to name or put a number on the cases 
that would come under the department's scanner after the Bombay High Court 
decision.

Meanwhile, Mr Singh also said that the CBDT has decided to file a caveat before 
the Supreme Court to ensure that no ex parte stay is granted on the Vodafone 
matter without hearing the tax department. 

The Bombay High Court had on Wednesday dismissed the writ petition of VIH 
challenging the validity and legality of a notice issued by the I-T department 
on failure to deduct tax at source on payments made in respect of transfer of 
securities relating to Hutch-Essar Ltd (now Vodafone Essar Ltd) 

Mr Prakash Chandra, Director General (International Taxation), said that the 
High Court decision would open the doors for the I-T Department to look into 
the entirety of Vodafone transactions and then decide whether they attract tax 
or not and also what nature of tax.

He highlighted that the law was very clear in the sense that once payment was 
made, tax had to be deducted at source. Mr Chandra pointed out that Vodafone 
had come through FIPB and as part of the clearances it was specified that it 
would be on its transactions subject to Indian laws, including those on TDS. 

"Till now, the moment we issued notice seeking further information and details, 
the writ petition was filed by them. The department was restrained to proceed 
during the pendency of the writ petition. Once the writ petition has been 
dismissed, our right to look into the details of the case has strengthened. We 
want to see the agreements between the parties, the valuations made by them. 
All these had to be looked into before deciding how much taxes are to be paid", 
Mr Chandra said.

He, however, said that the tax department would wait for eight weeks because 
the Bombay High Court had extended the earlier stay for this period. "Vodafone 
unfortunately had not filed the copies of the original agreement before us. We 
had asked them to do so. Unfortunately, they did not file it before the 
Honourable Bombay High Court. That was one of the reasons why the High Court 
imposed cost on them", Mr Chandra said. 

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/12/05/stories/2008120552190100.htm
Who is wise? He that learns from everyone. Who is powerful? He that governs his 
passions. Who is rich? He who is content. Who is that? Nobody
 - Benjamin Franklin






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kences1" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kences1?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to