Why no one saw it coming? 






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Probability theories dominated risk measurement in the world of finance. Now 
they failed to visualise black swan and consequences are disastrous.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



B. Sambamurthy 


Bank of England recently reduced the repo rate to 1.5 per cent, which is the 
lowest in its 315-years history. The rate is the lowest since 1694 - yes, not 
1964.The rates are near zero in the US and Japan. This is enough to shatter any 
illusion of normalcy. The conventional risk measures could not capture or 
foresee these risks. Shocked by the deluge of bank failures the Queen of 
England exclaimed, why no one saw it coming!

Mathematical principles 


"Anything in finance that has equations is suspicious," says Nassim Nicholas 
Taleb, a no nonsense and successful trader and author of Black Swan. He was, in 
fact, a quant who extensively used mathematical principles in his earlier 
avatar as trader. 

He also recommends banning portfolio theory and linear regression. This guru 
goes on with sage advice that Monte Carlo is more a way of thinking than 
computational method. Quite surprising indeed coming as it does from an ace 
mathematical trader. It looks as though new age bankers have become 
superstitious of mathematics. How philosophical is his thought that mathematics 
is a tool to meditate rather than compute. Whoever forgot that LTCM had two 
Noble Laureates on its board and they had extensively used mathematics in 
finance? Thanks to Math, Moon is within reach but safe banking is far off. 

A story goes that people believed that all swans were only white, till one day 
in the 16th century black swans were sighted in Australia. Well, black swan has 
emerged as a metaphor for the rarest of the rare event and which brings with it 
huge impact. Besides, it is prospectively unpredictable (that is where 
mathematics fail bankers). It is said that mathematics is backward looking and 
as such could not help in predicting the carnage ahead. 

No amount of loss reporting by the big and mighty surprise any more. Bailout 
packages for a couple of the US banks rivals India's GDP. We have this spectre 
in Iceland where the borrowers, lenders and the country are bankrupt. This is a 
classic example of how far unchecked wrong banking practices could go.

There are enough diatribes - greed, excessive leverage, fraud, lax regulations, 
indulgent monetary policies etc. There were sane voices too before the carnage. 
Toranto-Domonian, a Canadian Bank, had exited out-of-structured and other 
derivative products in 2005 itself. The CEO was then pilloried for leaving 
profit on the table. He said that he made the decision because he could not 
comprehend those products. This decision kept the bank in the black while many 
banks who did not exit bled profusely and many could not survive. He said that 
he is an old school banker. This CEO has a Ph.D. in economics is beside the 
point.

Peter Bernstein, author of Against the Gods, counsels that risk is not danger. 
It is uncertainty. Something good can happen or something bad too. 

Risk is not to be abhorred. It is vital for human progress. Tools that are good 
in a game of chance do not work in real world of finance. We underestimate the 
role luck in real world of finance but overestimate the role of luck in 
personal life. Probability theories dominated risk measurement in the world of 
finance. Now they failed to visualise black swan and consequences are 
disastrous. We need new skill sets to address uncertainty. Mr Taleb is a 
professor on this subject of uncertainty. There needs to be a paradigm shift 
from probability to uncertainty. 

Black swan events are not confined only to the universe of finance. Only a few 
months ago there were strident voices of huge talent shortage and how this can 
spoil India's growth story. Now, the same honchos are throwing out talent as 
excess baggage.

Every upheaval gives birth to new leaders, ideas and institutions. Better banks 
would no doubt emerge from ashes. What are the lessons for bankers? My guru 
gives me short interim list to rebuild business models and cajoles that it is 
not the end of the world. He promised more after the debris is cleared.

Lessons for bankers 


Remember you deal with other people's money. 

Risk management has to be top down.

If the CEO does not understand the risk in any line of business, he/she should 
not assume that someone down the line would know.

Business model that enables and encourages people to live beyond means is not 
sustainable. It does not matter you have sophisticated operating models to 
reach out fast to large number of people. Muscular operating model shall not 
dictate business wisdom.

Mathematical models cannot supplant human judgment. They can only supplement.

Tail risks can happen in our career times.

Risk is not dangerous, but uncertain. Develop skill sets for uncertainty. Don't 
get overawed by masters of universe.

Mere obsession with size, oblivious of strength, would make the bank shaky and 
not strong. Moderate banks involve with financial markets either for funding or 
profiteering.

At a more fundamental level, the Senior Manager shall be the anchor for any 
operating model.

Lending shall be driven by 'C' - character, capital & capacity

We learn a lot from failure. Get failure early before it gets too late?

There are large issues as well - socialisation of risk, regulatory arbitrage, 
excessive leverage Basel framework, market fundamentalism, reliability of 
economic capital, insane valuations, sustainability of universal banking model 
etc. Let policy makers, legislators and regulators grapple with these issues. 

Bankers need not wait for resolution of these larger issues and they can 
rebuild banks by correcting the business models. 

Black swan is not a wisecrack. Its philosophy is not to banish risk taking. It 
is about non-commoditised thinking.

Some know what they know. Some know what they do not know. Many do not know 
what they do not know. There is unknown-unknown. What is relevant is unknown 
more than known.

By the way, had Dr Reddy's RBI sighted black swans a couple of years ago when 
every one else was clinging to the white swan theory? 

Otherwise what explains his contra cyclical approach? Which swan you see now, 
Sir?

(The author is Director of IDBRT, an RBI sponsored institution and former CMD 
of Corporation Bank. [email protected]) 

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/01/26/stories/2009012650741200.htm

ekamber


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kences1" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kences1?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to