New survey findings released today show airlines worldwide lost over $1.4
billion to online fraudsters in 2008, about 1.3% of airlines’ online revenue
worldwide.


The data comes from a new independent Airline Online Fraud
Survey commissioned by CyberSource Corporation in association with Airline
Information LLC and completed January, 2009.

Airlines are on the front line of the battle against online fraud—33% of the
industry’s revenues derive from eCommerce, thrice the proportion of sales
transacted online by non-travel companies—so efficient management of the
problem is of critical concern to the airlines.

According to survey data, the ways airlines manage fraud vary significantly
by airline category.  In 2008, business-class airlines, with higher-priced
tickets to protect, typically embraced profit protection measures, whereas
low-cost carriers tended to focus on revenue capture.

On average, business airlines used the most fraud detection tools (6.5 tools
per business-class airline), had the highest rate of manual review (47%),
and rejected more bookings due to suspicion of fraud (3.6%).

Conversely, low-cost carriers used the least number of automated screening
tools (4.9 tools per low-cost carrier), were less likely to manually review
bookings (13%), and rejected fewer bookings due to suspicion of fraud (2%).

The result of these differing strategies is that in 2008 business airlines
lost 1.1% of their revenues to fraud and low-cost carriers, by contrast,
lost 1.6%.

“The good news is that solutions exist,” said Christopher Staab, Managing
Partner of Airline Information, an airline industry organisation. “Improving
the efficiency of fraud management is one of the quickest cost-cutting moves
airlines have at their disposal.”

Fraud management tactics vary widely by region. North
American-based companies relied far more heavily on detection tools,
employing an average of 7.5 tools versus a European average of 5.4—the
overall world average is 5.8.

North American airlines manually reviewed only 3% of their bookings whereas
Middle Eastern-based airlines manually reviewed 81%.

European and Asia Pacific-based airlines manually reviewed 22% and 49% of
their bookings respectively.

According to Akif Khan, CyberSource Head of Client and Technical Services in
the UK, “These findings highlight the need for airlines to adopt a more
automated, holistic approach to fraud management—from initial screening
through booking review and disposition. Improving the accuracy of automated
screening is key. In doing so, they can reduce overhead costs associated
with manual review, as well as improve revenue capture and lower fraud loss.
With the right tools, airlines can realise these benefits in a matter of
weeks--not years.”

B.Karthick

Research Analyst

WWW.KENCES1.BLOGSPOT.COM <http://www.kences1.blogspot.com/>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kences1" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kences1?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to