Hi Jianwu,
Sure, if you want a ByteToken, feel free to add it to the ptII tree.
Be sure that the code closely follows the coding standard.
Be sure to add unit tests.

data/UnsignedByteToken.java says:
 A token that contains a byte number in the range 0 through 255. This
 UnsignedByteToken definition is in contrast to Java's definition of a
 byte as a number in the range -128 through 127.

A ByteToken and an UnsignedByteToken are not losslessly convertible to each other.

_Christopher


On 2/13/13 4:28 PM, Jianwu Wang wrote:
Hi,

Kepler and Ptolemy support many types including unsignedByte. But I didn't see normal byte in Ptolemy. From the implementation of UnsignedByteToken, it looks we can use it for normal byte through its function like UnsignedByteToken(byte) and byteValue(). But I still think it is valuable to have a separate Byte type in Ptolemy. Any opinion on it? Thanks.


--
Christopher Brooks, PMP                       University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer  US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm/TRUST         Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
[email protected], 707.332.0670           (Office: 545Q Cory)

_______________________________________________
Kepler-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev

Reply via email to