> I'm not sure I understand- does MK use WSAPI, or is it a complementary and
> separate layer?

It would be an extra layer on top of WSAPI. WSAPI does a good job of
providing a very simple server-independent API, which is enough for
you to write a web app that can be then deployed in different ways.
However, a few of us have been finding ourselves all putting more or
less the same code on top of WSAPI to take care of things like URL
dispatching, etc. MK would be a common solution for such tasks. I
personally hope it will still stay pretty minimal and will resist
feature creep.

>>> What is SAPI, and what does it accomplish? This is one of the big points
>>
> It's a predecessor to WSAPI that is kept around because CGILua uses it?

I think so. If you are not using CGILua you shouldn't need to worry about it.

  - yuri

_______________________________________________
Kepler-Project mailing list
Kepler-Project@lists.luaforge.net
http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kepler-project
http://www.keplerproject.org/

Reply via email to