Hello all,

   I have been following the conversation, and since the subject opened up a 
bit I would also mention VisTrails.org.  They do not call it parameter sweep, 
but in actuality that is what they do as well.  Having said this VisTrails is 
out of the box geared toward visualizations (primarily because of the built-in 
modules), however it is very extensible.  I have looked at both Kepler and 
Vistrails.  I am a java programmer and had to step in to python as I chose 
Vistrails over Kepler.  I have no bias toward any tool and continue to follow 
the advances of Kepler.  Taverna was primarily web services oriented which did 
not fit our use case and target community.   Bottom line is that no workflow 
tool is a 100% fit. While I was reticent about learning the "plugin" aspects of 
any one tool due to time constraints, I found it the key to making it work.
   Having said this what Kepler has that Vistrails does not is the concept of 
Directors.  These, as best as I can tell, provide a variety of workflow 
"firing" models.  If you depend on that you probably need to stick with Kepler.

Eduardo

From: Christopher Brooks <c...@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:c...@eecs.berkeley.edu>>
Date: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:12 AM
To: Muhammad Usama <11mscsmus...@seecs.edu.pk<mailto:11mscsmus...@seecs.edu.pk>>
Cc: "kepler-users@kepler-project.org<mailto:kepler-users@kepler-project.org>" 
<kepler-users@kepler-project.org<mailto:kepler-users@kepler-project.org>>
Subject: Re: [kepler-users] Automate workflows?

You mean there are workflow systems other than Kepler and Ptolemy?  :-)  I had 
no idea.

Actually, I don't know of other systems for parameter sweeps, but I'm sure that 
they are out there.  Simulink can probably do them.  You could look at Taverna. 
 The parameter sweeps page below lists 
https://lists.eecs.berkeley.edu/sympa/arc/ptolemy-hackers/2008-01/msg00007.html,
 which discusses STELLA.  See 
http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/mailing-lists/split/0605/Re:_Berkeley_Madonna_and_System_Dynamics12
 for a discussion about System Dynamics.

_Christopher

On 9/19/13 6:17 AM, Muhammad Usama wrote:
Thank you for reply. Parameter Sweeps is a new word for me. I didn't find this 
word while looking for a way to automate wokflows. But now I do and now I am 
reading about Parameter Sweeps.

Other than Kepler, do you know any other workflow system which can do parameter 
sweeps until the required results are found?


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Christopher Brooks 
<c...@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:c...@eecs.berkeley.edu>> wrote:
Hi Muhammad,
This is an excellent question and something I've been meaning to try to answer 
in the Ptolemy II faq.

I just added something to the Ptolemy II faq about this:
http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/ptolemyII/ptIIfaq.htm#parameterSweeps
says:
4.11 How do a do a parameter sweep?
A Parameter Sweep is when a model is run a number of times with different 
parameters to perhaps find an optimal solution. For details, see 
http://chess.eecs.berkeley.edu/ptexternal/wiki/Main/ParameterSweeps<http://chess.eecs.berkeley.edu/ptexternal/wiki/Main/ParameterSweeps#in_browser>.
http://chess.eecs.berkeley.edu/ptexternal/wiki/Main/ParameterSweeps
says:

Parameter Sweeps

A Parameter Sweep is when a model is run a number of times with different 
parameters to perhaps find an optimal solution.

These two articles in Wikipedia might be of interest.

  *   Design of Experiments 
(DoE)<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_of_experiments> (Wikipedia)
  *   Monte Carlo 
Simulation<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_carlo_simulation> (Wikipedia)

One way to do optimization in Ptolemy II would be to do a parameter sweep on a 
model by using the higher order component (HOC) actors such as ModelReference.

See the ModelReference actor:

  *   Docs: 
http://sisyphus.eecs.berkeley.edu:8079/hudson/job/ptII/javadoc/ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/ModelReference.html
  *   Demo: ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/demo/ModelReference/ModelReference.xml

and RunCompositeActor

  *   
http://sisyphus.eecs.berkeley.edu:8079/hudson/job/ptII/javadoc/ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/RunCompositeActor.html

Tests:

  *   ptII/ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/test/auto/DEInPNInRunCompositeActor.xml
  *   ptII/ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/test/auto/RunCompositeActor.xml
  *   ptII/ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/test/auto/RunCompositeActor2.xml
  *   ptII/ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/test/auto/RunCompositeActor3.xml
  *   ptII/ptolemy/actor/lib/hoc/test/auto/RunCompositeActor4.xml

It is also possible to use a state machine:

  *   $PTII/ptolemy/domains/modal/demo/MultipleRuns/MultipleRuns.xml

Another way is to invoke the model multiple times from the command line and 
pass in different command line arguments. Properly escaping a string can be 
tricky.

  *   See 
http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/ptolemyII/ptIIfaq.htm#invoking%20Ptolemy%20II?

Ptolemy/Kepler papers that cover Parameter Sweeps

  *   Jianwu Wang, "Distributed Execution Architectures in Ptolemy 
II<http://chess.eecs.berkeley.edu/pubs/806/>," 9th Biennial Ptolemy 
Miniconference, February 16, 2011
  *   Jianwu Wang, Altintas, I., Hosseini, P.R., Barseghian, D., Crawl, D., 
Berkley, C., Jones, M.B., "Accelerating Parameter Sweep Workflows by Utilizing 
Ad-hoc Network Computing Resources: an Ecological 
Example<http://users.sdsc.edu/%7Ejianwu/JianwuWang_files/Accelerating%20Parameter%20Sweep%20Workflows%20by%20Utilizing%20Ad-hoc%20Network%20Computing%20Resources%20-%20an%20Ecological%20Example%20%28SWF%202009%29.pdf>,"
 Services - I, 2009 World Conference on, 6-10 July 2009. 
DOI<http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.9>
  *   David Abramson, Blair Bethwaite, Colin Enticott, Slavisa Garic, Tom 
Peachey, "Parameter Space Exploration Using Scientific 
Workflows<http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-01970-8_11>," 
Computational Science – ICCS 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 
5544, 2009, pp 104-113.

Ptolemy/Kepler Mailing List mentions of Parameter Sweeps

  *   Monte Carlo Simulation In 
BCVTB<https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/bcvtb/O0yofsqczOs/lNK1skgh5iQJ> 
October, 2012.
  *   Re: [kepler-users] System Dynamics 
Actor?<https://lists.eecs.berkeley.edu/sympa/arc/ptolemy-hackers/2008-01/msg00007.html>
 Jan. 2008.

On 9/18/13 6:14 AM, Muhammad Usama wrote:
Is there any way I can automate workflows? e.g. set the range of results which 
are required and then the workflow executes in loop and on each iterations some 
parameters are adjusted until the results meet the defined criteria?

Is there anyway I can do that in kepler? or is there any other system where I 
can do that?

--
Muhammad Usama
2011-NUST-MS-CS-009



_______________________________________________
Kepler-users mailing list
Kepler-users@kepler-project.org<mailto:Kepler-users@kepler-project.org>http://lists.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-users



--
Christopher Brooks, PMP                       University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer  US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm               Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
c...@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:c...@eecs.berkeley.edu>, 
707.332.0670<tel:707.332.0670>           (Office: 545Q Cory)




--
Muhammad Usama
2011-NUST-MS-CS-009



--
Christopher Brooks, PMP                       University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer  US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm               Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
c...@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:c...@eecs.berkeley.edu>, 707.332.0670           
(Office: 545Q Cory)

_______________________________________________
Kepler-users mailing list
Kepler-users@kepler-project.org
http://lists.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-users
  • [kep... Muhammad Usama
    • ... Christopher Brooks
      • ... Muhammad Usama
    • ... Valente, Eduardo G. (GSFC-610.3)[GLOBAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INC]

Reply via email to