On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:35 -0600, Will Fiveash wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:26:25PM +0100, Mark Phalan wrote: ... > > If we went with a single-letter option one of the following might be > > suitable: > > > > -F > > -y > > -n > > > > > > Any thoughts? I'm leaning towards "-y". Whatever we choose I'd like to > > bring it to MIT to see if they'll also support it so at least going > > forward there will be more compatibility. > > I pick -y
Ok. Shawn: any objections? > however unless we can convince MIT to change their interface > match ours then I don't think it's worth changing the Solaris kdb5_util > interface. I'd definitely like MIT to take the new option. > If one wants to do a non-interactive kdb5_util destroy then > either: > > echo yes|kdb5_util destroy > > or > > kdb5_util destroy <<EOF > yes > EOF > > or > > yes|kdb5_util destroy > > can be used. True, although having an option built-in is just better in my book. -M
