Note: I asked Will why make these interfaces Volatile, and it seems that
for now the Solaris Kerberos team wishes to go with Volatile for
new interfaces from any latest MIT krb5 release (that was done in
the PKINIT case, for example). MIT does not commit to interface
stability, only to ABI stability (the MIT krb5 ABI is effectively
Committed). CLIs are part of the Solaris ABI, but it's not clear
that MIT considers CLIs part of their ABI. I think Volatile is
reasonable for now, but I'd like to see all these interfaces'
stability upgraded later on.
Nico
--
