On Sep 19, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:45:11AM -0700, Henry B. Hotz wrote: >> API and source distribution compatibility does not necessarily imply >> ABI compatibility. I don't see a strong need for ABI compatibility. > > So every time MIT makes a new release you rebuild all other krb5/gss > applications that you run? > > Seriously??
Yes, but not the way you took it. I meant I don't care if the Sun-supplied library on a Solaris box has the same ABI as a corresponding library built directly from the MIT distribution (presumably with different configure options). ------------------------------------------------------ The opinions expressed in this message are mine, not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government. Henry.B.Hotz at jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz at oxy.edu
