On 09/25/09 13:17, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:17:00PM -0400, Tom Yu wrote: > >> I was puzzled at why sigaction() was not being used to set up the >> SIGPIPE handler, and it looks like the MIT code is using sigaction(), >> but OpenSolaris is not, for some reason. >> > > My guess: MIT fixed this eons ago and we didn't. The fork of this > particular bit of code may go back to the late 90s. > > Nico > That did not get picked up on the re-syncs?
OK - fine - I will open a new CR about the signal() to sigaction(). If I change to sigaction() are we all good with the fix as proposed? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/kerberos-discuss/attachments/20090925/a5bb0897/attachment.html>
