-----Original Message-----
From: Zafar Baig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:27 AM
To: David Lawler Christiansen (NT); hot ice; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kerberos on the web
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/en/xml/00/04/28/000428enkerpub.xml
Please read this article carefully to understand interoperability issues.
Excerpts from this article....
"....Microsoft's PAC locks users into its version of Kerberos."
-----Original Message-----
From: David Lawler Christiansen (NT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:47 PM
To: hot ice; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kerberos on the web
Not trolling, but where exactly did you hear that we were doing it "all
our way", and what does that mean?Thanks!
-Dave> -----Original Message-----
> From: hot ice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Kerberos on the web
>
>
> Are there any commercially available kerberos-based
> authentication products for the web? I know Microsoft is
> doing something with Passport - but that's still all fuzzy
> and they are doing it in typical MS-fashion doing it all
> their way, or so I hear.
>
> Any suggestions or recommendations on products that offer
> website authentication - username/password, smartcard and a
> combination..?
>
> TIA
>
Title: Message
No
offense, but this article is old news, speculative and misleading in
places. It has nothing to do with MS's use of Kerberos in Passport (which
is what Ice is asking, I think), and only questions whether our Kerberos
implementation will interoperate with any other implementation. The simple
question I must ask in this case is, "have you TRIED it?"
My
experience is that everyone who insists that we don't interoperate is either
speculating, mistaken, or outright lying. We interop just
fine, either as a client, a server, or as a KDC, in
single and multiple-realm scenarios. If you don't believe me, hunt down
someone with Win2K and/or WinXP, or get on the beta program for .NET
server. Run your own tests and draw your own conclusions-- don't just
believe the spin.
Thanks!
-Dave
- Re: Kerberos on the web Douglas E. Engert
- Re: Kerberos on the web Kevin Coffman
- Re: Kerberos on the web Tim Alsop
- RE: Kerberos on the web Krassimir Boyanov (Anaheim)
- RE: Kerberos on the web David Lawler Christiansen (NT)
- RE: Kerberos on the web Zafar Baig
- Re: Kerberos on the web hot ice
- Re: Kerberos on the web Nicolas Williams
- Re: Kerberos on the web Cesar Garcia
- Re: Kerberos on the web meeroh
- Re: Kerberos on the web David Lawler Christiansen (NT)
- Re: Kerberos on the web Wyllys Ingersoll
- Re: Kerberos on the web Nicolas Williams
- RE: Kerberos on the web Zafar Baig
- Re: Kerberos on the web Nicolas Williams
- Re: Kerberos on the web Mark H. Wood
- RE: Kerberos on the web Zafar Baig
- RE: Kerberos on the web David Lawler Christiansen (NT)
- Re: Kerberos on the web Wyllys Ingersoll
- RE: Kerberos on the web Paul Jakma
- Re: Kerberos on the web Jeremy Allison
