>What I neglected to mention was that we are a former CyberSafe >customer, with remnants of CyberSafe code still in production. >(Now I'll be getting pity, not sympathy.)
You poor bastard :-/ >Admittedly, I'll have to assess the current dependencies that >we have on IP addresses. The implementation of krb524d that >we currently use requires IP addresses, or it barfs. This may >well be the only dependency that we really have. Client krb524 >code has already been migrated to MIT. Oh! Shoot, that's an easy fix ... I did that a long time ago. Contact me privately if you want the fix for that. --Ken _______________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
