Thank you for the reply. I am a newby to kerberos (but not security/encryption etc). maybe I am wrong! it just is clear from many of the articles here that Microsoft Kerberos is not fully interoperable with your version. Please indulge a newbie!
I just don't want to incur the cost of writing an app and then finding problems with the MS version as most clients will want a Linux implementation of our app!. thanks once again "David Lawler Christiansen (NT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. ntdev.microsoft.com... > > I've heard people talking about "compatibility problems" on this list. > I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand why people would > call the behavior that. > > I have not heard about the "genuine issues" you describe. Could you > enumerate them? If there are "genuine issues" with MS Kerberos, we > would obviously like to know about them. Heck, there might even be > fixes already. > > ----- > This message or posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > confers no rights. > Any opinions or policies stated in this mail are my opinions and do not > necessarily constitute those of my employer. > Harvesting of this address for purposes of bulk email (including "spam") > is prohibited without my expressed prior request. I retaliate viciously > against spammers and spam sites. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:32 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: 1)kerberizing an app and 2) the mit kerberos on > > NT4/w2k executables (server) > > > > > > After reading many of the studies and case examples here, it > > is clear that the W2K version of kerberos has genuine issues > > and compatibility problems. I am wanting to design an app > > that is genuinely kerberized and therfeorte want to run the > > MIT version on a NT or W2K macjine, not using the existing > > capability supplioed by microsoft. > > > > 1)The intention is that the mit dll will be written as a com > > object and then the project will use this dll to enable the > > secure comms. I really would like to know that it is feasible > > and comments are welcome. (the advantages are obvious... a > > DLL means that we can program in languages like VB for the > > client). We have already done some investigation and to get > > the com object looks quite reasonable and low cost > > development ( ooh that sounds like famous last words if I > > ever heard:-)) > > > > 2) the further issue is the W2K vs MIT. I recognize that it > > is possible to compile fro W2K and a few examples exist > > already on the site. Does anyone have a source for the > > complied executables for win 32 SERVER (not client) > > > > > > ________________________________________________ > > Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos > > > ________________________________________________ > Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos > ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
