On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Umm, cvs has native GSSAPI support, or it did when I left cygnus (5 > years ago or so?) So you're saying gserver, versus kserver then? Just FMI.
> > Nonetheless, I'd recommend "cvs over openssh with gss support" > instead. But doing that doesn't really do anything for authentication, other than adding 2 layers, and 2 maintenance points. I say that because with pserver, you've got to maintain a set of usernames/passwords, but don't need user accounts on the box. With gserver and OpenSSH you would need user accounts on the box, AND maintain the file with the principals. Is that not correct? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it." Latin Proverb
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
