Just curious, but do you have the latest recommended patch set?(from May 06 2002) There are several PAM and KRB libs replaced in the latest patch set.
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 21:07, Suchun Wu wrote: > It seems no luck for me to find a fix for the problem. I have talked > Sun support guys. They don't think it is their problem. Anyway, I > did not use the Solaris kerberos. I compiled with MIT Kerberos > 5.1.2.4. > I really would like to learn from anyone who has successfully set > up SSO solution with Kerberos, SSH, and Solaris pam. > > Thanks, > > Suchun > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Wilkinson) > Message-ID: <abf1fu$mam$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 23:41:50 +0000 (UTC) > > Sam Hartman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > : This cannot be a Kerberos bug; the ssh patches are responsible for > : ccache permissions. > > I suspect, from previous posts on this subject, that its an problem > with the interaction between OpenSSH and the Solaris pam_krb5 > module. > If the original poster isn't using PAM for password authentication, > I'll investigate further. > > Cheers, > > Simon. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half." Sir Winston Churchill
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
