Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>>"Marc" == Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> > > Marc> PS: Slackware doesn't integrate PAM. > > There's a point at which you have to ask yourself why you're running > Slackware. If you're not willing to ask that question, then you > should at least ask whether building PAM libraries and Kerberos PAM > modules for applications like xlock, etc, etc is going to take up less > of your time than integrating Kerberos support into all those > applications. > > ________________________________________________ > Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos > >
Well I think that's Slackware's job, which SHOULD integrate PAM in their next release ! I hope they will do that, it would help us alot. Regards ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
