>I assumed it was a given in this case that the original export was done >legally. True, the UK Debian mirror is no different from a US mirror in >this regard, but I took your message as suggesting there was a known >export violation here.
My apologies if I implied Debian was doing the wrong thing; AFACT, they are complying with the appropriate regs. >In any case, though IANAL, my understanding of the export regs are that >the penalties apply mostly to the *exporter*; so anyone outside the US who >gets their hands on Kerberos is safe, unless they're also redistributing >it and becoming exporters themselves. My understanding is different, but since neither one of us are lawyers, perhaps further speculation is not useful :-) --Ken ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
