"G�L" == G�L Bal�zs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
G�L> Tim Mooney �rta: >> All- I'm looking for recommendations on which krb5 PAM module I >> should use on a sparc box I'll be reinstalling with Solaris 2.8 >> in a couple weeks.
G�L> pam-krb5.sf.net. This is an enhanced version of RedHat's G�L> pam_krb5. I will release rc8 in this weekend, it will G�L> contains many workarounds for the solaris pam G�L> implementation, so I recommend it.
Hi. I have not looked at this specific implementation, but I have encountered the Redhat PAM module and would like to gvie astrong disrecommendation to that code base.
Sorry, but without any good reason I CANT agree this. Please tell me concrete bugs! Withouth these I can only request, that please dont criticize anything whereof do you dont know enough well.
It seems like the module does way too much
I dont think, that if a pam_krb5 module support krb4 or afs should be a bug. I think this features should be implemented in a pam_krb5 modul, rather than in a separate module.
and has too much internal
information about the Kerberos implementation.
Sorry, but I dont understand this. Whats the problem?
In particular, it even parses krb5.conf (incorrectly).
This feature is deprecated and only compiled if requested.
balsa
________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
