Sam Hartman wrote: > > >>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo V G C Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Gustavo> Hi folks! i wonder if in a hierarchically organized > Gustavo> realm path, the transited encoding field could be omited > Gustavo> (provide no node in the realm tree would be bypassed)? > Gustavo> Would this violate the protocol? > > Yes doing so would violate the protocol. > > Gustavo> In RFC1510 it is said that a KDC may not to include a > Gustavo> realm in the transited encoded field, i.e., a third party > Gustavo> realm! Would not this be a standard violation? > > You seem to be doing enough work with Kerberos that you are really better off taking > the following steps: > > 1) subscribing to and reading the IETF working group list where > protocol discussions take place. > > 2) Reading draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications instead of RFC > 1510. > > Start at http://www.ietf.org/, look for working groups and then look > for Kerberos. This will include mailing list instructions as well as > pointers to the Kerberos drafts.
Dear gentleman, thank you very much for your support. I will follow your instructions. I am sorry to bother this list. I just thought this place was the right one where i could have my questions answered. My mistaken. Once more, THANK you very much for all your time and cooperation. best regards. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
