>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> "Nebergall," == Nebergall, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sam> Briefly, there are not many open issues left. Once these are
Sam> resolved the draft will presumably enter working group last
Sam> call which takes two weeks. Then there will be an IETF last
Sam> call which takes two weeks. Assuming no issues requiring
Sam> significant work happen at either stage, the draft will be
Sam> placed on the IESG agenda for their approval. The earliest
Sam> this could happen is January 20, 2006.
Or rather January 20, 2005.
Sam> For a draft this complicated I'd expect at least some
Sam> concerns raised by the IESG.
Sam> So earliest possible date for approval is January 20. More
Sam> likely, approval in February with some reasonable chance of
Sam> much longer than that.
Sam> In the grand scheme of things, this is very close to
Sam> approval. I would not expect any more protocol changes
Sam> unless someone finds something unexpected.
Sam> --Sam, speaking only for myself
Sam> ________________________________________________ Kerberos
Sam> mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
