I wasn't privy to the actual conversation; I will try to get further details and pass them on. It seemed strange to me, but also consistent with the behavior I was seeing.
-r. On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:31:53PM -0500, Ken Raeburn wrote: > On Dec 8, 2004, at 17:49, Rachel Elizabeth Dillon wrote: > >A colleague went and asked Cisco about the Kerberos preauthentication > >issue on VPN 3000 series hardware, and apparently they do not support > >preauthentication and do not intend to do so. I thought this might be > >useful to other people on this list, so I sent it along. > > What kind of preauth? Compliance with RFC 1510 requires support for > encrypted-timestamp preauth. > > Ken >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
