On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:03:36PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 07, 2005 05:46:18 PM -0700 Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >and the right tgt (based on Kerberos by Brian Tung), doesn't seem to be > >doing anything: > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This principal is meaningless, and is used for nothing. > > >and the mystery ticket is doing everything: > > > >krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This principal is the local-realm ticket-granting service. > > In other words, it's working exactly like it's supposed to. It's anyone's > guess where the meaningless principal came from.
So [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not what MIT krb uses as the TGT, it uses krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED] - just a discrepency between the MIT implimentation and the Kerb book I have? OK, I'm happy with that. Deleting the meaningless ticket in test seems to be harmless. Sweet. OK, awesome, thanks. -- Phil Dibowitz Systems Architect and Administrator Enterprise Infrastructure / ISD / USC UCC 180 - 213-821-5427
pgpiONfOaTXHw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
