2005/8/4, Sensei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2005-07-31 19:28:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Savard) said: > (...) > > > If I remember right, those databases should be compatible. But, check > it with kdb5_util from the command line. >
# kdb5_util dump kdb5_util: Invalid argument while setting active database to '/etc/krb5kdc/principal' ;-( > > > > Here is my krb5.conf: > > (...) > > > > [kdc] > > profile = /etc/krb5kdc/kdc.conf > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Why? There's no [kdc] section in krb5.conf --- check it with > > man krb5.conf > > if they've changed the sections in gentoo. > Checked, there is no documented kdc section in the man pages. So, I removed the stanza, but doesn't fixed anything. > (...) > > Create it or remove the entry. In the man page, I don't see the default > behavior if no dictionary exists. > > Didn't change anything. > > When trying to startup the KDC, I am getting the messages already > > mentionned in my previous post. Not much more details than that. > > Unless you can told me a way to increase debugging level. > > > > Check the kdc.conf again and be sure the database works with the tools > provided by kerberos. Also, be sure all the principals exist in the db, > like K/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on. > Well, since I don't have access with the tools, a strings principal gave me some output where I can see all principals I know seems to be there. > -- > Sensei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can a crash being responsible for some lock files or something like that which prevent proper access to the database? Or, is Kerberos using a library to parse arguments that can be bogus on my system? How can I check that? Since the message doesn't say anything about the arguments used. -- ----------------- Daniel Savard ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
