On Aug 18, 2005, at 17:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know you weren't trying to write any production code or anything. I was just pointing out, that if the memory leak is moved to krb5_init_context(), then the problem is solved for realistic cases. And I was just trying to say it wouldn't fix the problem in your test program and that your leak test would still leak.
We've run into other cases where a krb5_context is needed but other APIs make it difficult for one to be made available. So there's code out there that allocates many short-lived krb5_context structures, often without using them for actual network stuff.
________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
