>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> I meant to also add that I think it is generally considered
Jim> bad form to silently fall back to a weaker security mechanism
Jim> when a stronger on fails. I want to be able to configure my
Jim> mail client to use GSSAPI, and if it fails, I want to be told
Jim> that it failed, not fall back and perhaps successfully
Jim> authenticate using CRAM-MD5, leaving me without a clue that
Jim> my chosen auth method is not working.
I agree having this option is nice. However I also think it is
important to have a usable default behavior.
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
