Ken Raeburn wrote:
[safeTgram (optim1) receive status: NOT encrypted, NOT signed.]
On Sep 30, 2005, at 02:44, Jeremy Hunt wrote:
This seems harmless enough, however further investigation shows
that k5-int.h has this definition for struct _krb5_donot_replay:
Yes.
and krb5-hin (which generates krb5.in after make) has this definition:
Not in the version in the 1.4.2 tarball I just grabbed from our web
site. Nor in the initial 1.4 release I just checked out from CVS.
(This change was made between the 1.3 series and 1.4.) Please re-
check where you got those sources from.
You are absolutely right Ken, I had an old version of this file. Thank
you for putting me right, and sorry I had not picked it up before
asking. I did think I had checked that possibility beforehand.
I guess I should re-check all files before I attempt to rebuild again.
Ken
Cheers,
Jeremy
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
