Douglas E. Engert wrote: > Your assessment of Oracle support appears to be what we are hearing as > well. > Which is too bad, is it does not look like it would take to much to make > it work better. > > Are you interested in pursuing additional changes, if we can get enough > different organizations to complain? >
We're very interested - the Navy has an enterprise license to use Oracle, thus many DoD/Navy commands such as ours are being directed to use it when a database is called for. I also got a laugh when our Oracle sales representative told us we would be 'unsupported' if we chose to use their products with Kerberos (specifically their OID and portal products). I had to explain that their Active Directory integration they were touting so highly depended on a key component of AD, namely Kerberos. Ridiculous. --Craig -- / Craig Huckabee | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / / Code 715-CH | phone: (843) 218 5653 / / SPAWAR Systems Center | close proximity: "Hey You!" / / Charleston, SC | ICBM: 32.78N, 79.93W / ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
