>>>>> "prashant" == prashant sodhiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
prashant> Hi, Can anybody please clarify me, that whether the MIT
prashant> kerberos latest release (1.4.3) is compatible/adheres to
prashant> RFC 4120 and RFC 4121.
We comply with RFC 4121.
For the most part we comply with RFC 4120.
Here are the ways in which I don't think we comply with 4120:
* We don't reject unknown authorization data
* We use DNS in ways prohibited by the spec for hostname canonicalization
* We do not implement directional addresses
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
