On Tuesday, April 11, 2006 08:40:10 PM +0200 Sensei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good. One thing I noticed on many clients here is that an ntpdate at > boot solution is not good, since it can produce large time drifts if > you don't reboot the clients often. A cron job was my solution. Note that neither ntpdate-at-boot nor a cron job that runs ntpdate once in a while really count as "running NTP". A real NTP client needs to be running continuously, not just for a few seconds once in a while. Over time it will establish an ideal clock which closely tracks the upstream NTP servers. It will then correct the system clock by slowly adjusting its rate, ultimately leaving it running at something resembling the correct rate. Just running ntpdate cannot do this -- it's not running long enough to get an idea of how far off-frequency the system clock is. -- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sr. Research Systems Programmer School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
