On 9/21/07, John Hascall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > John Harris wrote: > > > Does MIT's current implementation of the Kerberos KDC include > > > incremental propagation? I know it didn't a long time ago, then there > > > were CITI patches for it, then those didn't work for awhile. I don't > > > seem to be able to pinpoint an answer to it. > > Jeffrey Altman replied: > > There is no incremental propagation distributed with MIT Kerberos. > > I haven't studied it all that extensively, > so correct me if I am wrong, but with the > new "DAL" stuff there is now an opportunity > to do a 'proper' job of multi-master KDCs > (dare I say it) in a "ubik-like" or "AD-like" > manner. > > Is there anybody out there already looking at this?
My intention is to make our patch a "plugin wrapper", and hopefully something that would eventually acceptable to be included in the distribution. I think that one of the big turn-offs initially was its use of threads. With the thread-safe library, I hope that is less of a deterrent. K.C. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
