John Hascall wrote: > As a part of our seemingly endless path to > eliminating KRB4 I was thinking I'd like > to replace or modify krb524d to just log > the request and always return an error > (KRB524_KRB4_DISABLED seems ideal, but as > near as I can tell it only is used in the > client code). Has anyone gone down this > path before? > > Thanks, > John > I think that is reasonable. The clients already have to expect to receive that value if the library was built without 524 support.
Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
