Ken Raeburn wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007, at 20:00, Yoshinori Sano wrote: >> Could you tell me about the license of MIT Kerberos. > > The license terms are covered in the top-level README file in the > source tree, and in doc/copyright.texinfo. > >> Is the MIT Kerberos implementation exactly same as MIT Licence? >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License >> (As I'm a newbie about licenses.) >
Just one legal nit that Ken did not point out. You cannot reference a license listed on a third-party's web site for authorative information. You must reference the license that is in the actual distribution. That license is the authorative reference. Danny > No, it's not quite the same. Furthermore, the MIT Kerberos > distribution includes open-source software from other sources, and > their licenses apply to those portions of the software. > >> And, can we bundle the MIT Kerberos implemention with a commercial >> software in Japan? Is there no problems? > > Provided you comply with the licensing terms, yes, it should be fine; > other companies are doing it. > > Ken ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
